Discovery & scope
Service line scope, panel composition, measurement stack, EHR landscape, institutional protocol references, security and data-review requirements.
Implementation
A structured, phased implementation built around your clinical operations and clinical IT.
MPS implementations are scoped, configured, validated, and deployed jointly with your clinical leadership and clinical IT — not pushed in over the top.
Phased model
Five phases. Joint ownership. Clinical leadership in the loop.
Most enterprise partners reach a clinical pilot within 8–12 weeks of executed agreement, depending on integration complexity and protocol scope.
Configuration
Measurement tiers, score thresholds, domain definitions, recommendation logic, and report templates configured to your protocols and reviewed by your clinical leadership.
Integration
HL7v2, FHIR, and batch ingestion configured with your clinical IT team. Report delivery into the EHR channel your clinicians already use.
Clinical pilot
Limited pilot panel, mirrored against existing workflow. Side-by-side validation, clinician feedback, threshold tuning, and report refinement before broader rollout.
Program rollout
Phased site/clinician rollout, governance cadence with clinical leadership, and ongoing release review. MPS releases are explicitly opt-in for configuration changes.
Ongoing partnership
Quarterly review, configuration evolution, and roadmap input. Health systems and longevity platforms operate MPS as a long-term clinical infrastructure layer.
Integration
Built for clinical IT, not consumer rails.
MPS speaks the protocols your clinical IT team already supports and delivers into the document workflow your clinicians already use. No parallel surface to maintain.
- Inbound · clinicalHL7v2 (ORU, ADT), FHIR R4 (Observation, Patient, Condition, MedicationStatement), batch SFTP/SDM
- Inbound · devicesStructured exports and integration pathways for physiologic testing, DEXA-derived body composition, and grip strength
- Outbound · reportPDF / structured document delivered into EHR media tab, results inbox, or downstream document workflow
- Outbound · structuredFHIR DiagnosticReport / Observation when the partner system supports structured ingestion
- IdentitySAML / OIDC SSO for clinician-facing review; institutional IdP-aligned
- EnvironmentDedicated tenancy options; in-region hosting available for partners with data residency requirements
Security & data review
Built for institutional diligence.
Apogee expects enterprise diligence. We share architecture, controls, data flows, and configuration logic with your security, privacy, and clinical-IT reviewers as part of every engagement.
Controls & posture
- EncryptionIn transit and at rest; key management aligned to enterprise expectations
- AccessRole-based access, audit logging, SSO via institutional IdP
- Data minimizationOnly the clinical fields required for interpretation; configurable PHI handling
- TenancyDedicated tenancy and in-region hosting available
Review materials
- Architecture briefComponent, data-flow, and tenancy diagrams
- Data handlingPHI inventory, retention, deletion, and breach response
- Configuration logDocumented score thresholds, domain definitions, and recommendation logic per release
- BAABusiness Associate Agreements provided under enterprise engagements
Apogee operates in alignment with HIPAA expectations and offers BAAs to enterprise partners. We do not claim formal HIPAA certification; HIPAA is a compliance framework, not a certification program.
Bring our team into your diligence process.
We will work directly with your security, clinical-IT, privacy, and clinical leadership reviewers — and pre-package the materials your teams typically need.